Has anyone found that fasting works better for them than a basic caloric deficit?
Has anyone completed an entire day fast and stuck to it?
Every diet works by causing a calorie deficit. You must choose one that you can stick with psychologically. It is also critical that the diet be sustainable and that you can envision yourself following it for a long time. Personally, all-day fasting sounds too difficult for me, and I would definitely discontinue it right away.
Fasting has yielded results that I have never seen before when attempting to lose weight. It’s difficult the first few times, but like with anything, it gets better with practice, and I now find it far simpler to not think about or deal with food for a day or two than to constantly think about my next meal. I do two 36-hour fasts per week. However, intermittent fasting does not work for me since I cannot get all of my calories in two meals; instead, I like to spread them out over the day. It took me a long time to figure out what worked best for me; everyone is different.
I’ve done several day fasts and can guarantee you they’re not for everyone. I felt nauseated for the entire second and third days. Unless you had days to waste away, I would simply remain with a typical caloric restriction.
I aim to just eat between 12 and 8 p.m. I only get a cup of coffee in the morning and sip water to fill my tummy.
During Ramadan, I fast from sunrise to sunset every day for 30 days, however this causes me to want to eat more at supper, and the incredibly early breakfast before sunrise doesn’t help much because I go back to sleep straight after eating.
Intermittent fasting works better for me when it comes to weight loss.
This sub is just people trying to lose weight without being in a caloric deficit, with practically everyone in the comments reminding them that they must be in a caloric deficit.
I’ve always found it useful. I’m never satisfied with standard meal sizes, and when on CICO, I’m only permitted 1480 calories per day. I’d rather have two large meals than three small ones, and I find that once I start eating for the day, my hunger sets in. I aim to forgo breakfast whenever possible, have a normal-ish lunch, and eat a larger dinner. Generally, it works great for me.
Most days, I practice 19/5 intermittent fasting; I eat lunch at noon, dinner at 5, and don’t eat again until noon the next day. I track calories, and skipping breakfast allows me to eat more satisfying meals later in the day. Fasting alone does not help me lose weight; but, controlling calories helps.
These are not mutually exclusive, or even linked.
You can intermittent fast while maintaining a calorie surplus, and you will gain weight.
Or you can follow a regular food plan with a calorie deficit and lose weight.
Alternatively, you can try intermittent fasting with a calorie deficit. and also lose weight. Weight reduction is ultimately about calorie shortfall.
Research on the distinct benefits of intermittent fasting is limited and ambiguous, and it is sometimes confused with the related caloric deficit. However, many people find it a sustainable way to achieve a deficit, and as such, it can be an effective eating strategy.
If you want to reduce weight, it doesn’t have to be either intermittent fasting or a calorie deficit.
If you want to reduce weight, you must create a calorie deficit.
Many people feel that intermittent fasting is a more convenient strategy to create and maintain a calorie deficit. However, if you want to reduce weight, you will need to maintain a calorie deficit.
Intermittent fasting and calorie restriction are both effective methods for weight loss. Choose an approach that fits your lifestyle and tastes. Experiment to see what works best for you, and prioritise sustainable habits for long-term success. Discover more information on my Quora profile!
However, intermittent fasting was no more successful than regular dieting for weight loss. Intermittent fasting had no greater effect on health markers than daily calorie restriction. Dropout rates were low but similar for both diet groups, indicating that individuals found them equally easy to keep to. A fasting diet may result in less calories due to less time for regular eating. These eating habits are being investigated as potential techniques to stay healthy and live longer. These are not short-term weight-loss strategies.
That depends on the individual. Some people enjoy eating, while others can do without. People fail diets because they are too hungry, and they typically reach a plateau and are unable to overcome it.
If you wish to fast, I recommend eating a protein-rich lunch, as you will likely not be hungry for a long period of time, allowing you to fast.
The best diet is one that does not leave you hungry, is something you can do every day, and does not feel like a diet.
Dieting is a marathon, not a sprint, and a diet that does not leave you hungry is one on which you can run a marathon.
Yes, IF is superior to calorie-restricted diets. Even if you eat in a limited window, you will be unable to consume more. Fasting for long periods of time also allows your digestive system to function more efficiently, resulting in weight loss and improved health.
Both are beneficial in various ways. If you want to lose weight quickly, go with intermittent fasting.
Calorie restriction helps to maintain a healthy weight.
The actual issue is understanding your needs and physical health before deciding on a diet plan.
Intermittent Fasting
means consuming food at regular intervals while focussing on eating nutritious foods.
Once in a blue moon, you can consume sweets, but only at regular intervals.
*Caloric restriction
Reduce the intake of carbohydrates
As a result of this, you will undoubtedly lose weight but will not feel more energetic or healthier.
So, plainly intermittent fasting is much superior, and we will remain consistent with this diet plan.